Berry v. . Haines
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
No argument was made in the case. The act "to suspend executions for a limited time" was brought under the judgment of this Court in consequence of an application on the part of the debtor to obtain the benefit of the stay.
The application was rejected on the principle that the act in allowing such stay impaired the obligation of contracts, and thereby violated the Constitution of the United States.
It was not intended by Jones v. Crittenden, ante, 55, to anticipate any legal consequences which might appertain to those cases where the suspension had already been effected, further than to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lowery v. School Trustees.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Russell v. AyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Riggsbee v. . Town of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. Mecklenburg CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- State Ex Rel. McCubbins v. BarringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1868
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lowery v. School Trustees.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. Mecklenburg CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Commissioners v. . BoringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Commissioners of Bladen County v. BoringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918