New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Reeves
New York Supreme Court
Motion by the plaintiff to continue a temporary injunction during the pendency of the action.
1Opinion of the CourtLambert, J.
This action was commenced by the service of a summons and complaint in August, 1901, and an order to show cause containing a restraining clause was made returnable in eight days thereafter. The hearing thereon was continued to meet the convenience of counsel until October of that year, when the questions involved were finally submitted. The purpose of the action was to restrain the defendants during the Pan-American Exposition, held in the city of Buffalo, and ending October 31, 1901, from selling and dealing in special low rate tickets issued by the plaintiff to persons expressing a desire…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brinkerhoff v. BrownNew York Court of Chancery · 1822
- Strobel v. . Kerr Salt Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- People Ex Rel. Tyroler v. Warden of City PrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Boyd & Suydam v. Hoyt & ParselNew York Court of Chancery · 1835
- Town of Venice v. . WoodruffNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bitterman v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Lytle v. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1907
- Roche v. FLORAL RENTAL CORP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Roche v. Floral Rental Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967