Legal Opinion

Samuel Freedman v. Philadelphia Terminals Auction Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 30, 1956No. Civ.A. 19847PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN DUSEN, District Judge. ■

This case, currently before thte court on defendant’s Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b), Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S. C.A., involves a suit by plaintiffs, members of an unincorporated association of Philadelphia wholesale fruit merchants, against defendant, a New Jersey corporation engaged in the business of auctioning such fruit in Philadelphia. -• The complaint is founded on certain provisions of the federal anti-trust laws and also on general provisions of the law of fraudulent misrepresentation and resti tution as they relate to business transactions,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. Employing Plasterers Assn. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Hopkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Neuman v. Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. of HartfordWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Freedman v. Philadelphia Terminals Auction Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
  3. Johnson v. AETNA CAS. & SUR. CO. OF HARTFORDWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Falsetti v. Local Union No. 2026, United Mine Workers of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Manok v. Southeast District Bowling AssociationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API