Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Longmore

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1965No. 35856Published

1DissentCarter, J.

I dissent from the opinion of the court in this case on two basic grounds: First, that there is no appealable order and, second, that any right of appeal possessed by the defendant was waived.

As to the first point, it has always been the law of this state that a sentence is necessary to the right of appeal in a criminal case. Farrington v. State, 116 Neb. 712, 218 N. W. 590; Gartner v. State, 36 Neb. 280, 54 N. W. 516. In the instant case the jury returned a verdict of guilty, a motion for a new trial was filed and overruled, and sentence was suspended as provided by section 29-2218, R. R. S.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Korematsu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Brooks v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Kennedy v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Gartner v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Farrington v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API