Legal Opinion

Burt v. Richardson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 24, 1958No. 37,183PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Magney, Commissioner.

Defendant, Eulalia H. Richardson, appeals from a judgment entered against her.

One evening in the spring of 1955, plaintiff, Agnes M. Burt, and her husband, Alfred P. Burt, met defendant and her husband, George H. Richardson, at a club. The couples had been friends for years. Plans for the next winter’s vacation came up in the conversation. The Burts had planned to fly to Florida. The Richardsons were also planning a Florida vacation. Both couples were intending to leave ■ about the same time. According to Mr. Burt, the Burts said that they intended to fly, and the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Knutson Ex Rel. Knutson v. LurieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  2. Stenberg v. BuckleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  3. Bookhart v. Greenlease-Lied Motor Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  4. Thuente v. Hart MotorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  5. Clendenning v. SimermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Livingston v. SchreckengostSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  2. Stotzheim v. DjosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Burt v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API