Legal Opinion

Williams v. Carr

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.

This was a suit in equity brought by plaintiff, in error to restrain the collection of the judgment at law obtained by *369the defendant in error against the plaintiff, in Williams v. Carr, ante, 363, and is an adjunct of that case.

The allegations in the complaint are identical in substance with the motions and defenses set up in the answer and adjudicated in that case, containing no new matter whatever.

It is hard to determine the theory upon which counsel based the suit, unless it can be gathered from the following contained in the argument of counsel:

“The deposition of Ulman was taken in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Savage v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Butler v. RockwellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  3. Fetta v. VandevierColorado Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Dale v. RooseveltNew York Court of Chancery · 1821

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sweet v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1915
  2. Pueblo Chicago Lumber Co. v. DanzigerColorado Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Pueblo Chicago Lumber Co. v. DanzigerColorado Court of Appeals · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API