Legal Opinion

Wylie v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 7, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Amended judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action pursuant to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA) to recover damages for the injuries he allegedly sustained during the course of his employment as a railroad conductor/brakeman. Defendant appeals from an amended judgment entered upon an itemized jury verdict awarding plaintiff $3,509,724 in damages. The first trial ended in a mistrial at the close of proof (Wylie I). The jury in the second trial returned a verdict in the amount of $4,031,926, but we reversed the amended judgment on appeal…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. VelascoNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Kirschhoffer v. Van DykeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Frangella v. SussmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Gallo v. LinkowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Rubio v. ReillyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rivenburg v. Highland HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Turner v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API