Legal Opinion

Golosky v. Wherle

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 2, 1968No. 43263PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs separately sued defendants in two counts for damages, including pain and suffering, sustained in an automobile collision. Count 1 sought actual and punitive damages. Liability was admitted. The cases were tried together and consolidated on appeal. In his instructions to the jury, the trial judge charged the law relating to punitive damages. He directed the jury in effect that if they found a verdict on Count 1 their verdict should separately show the amount of actual and punitive damages. The jury returned a lump sum verdict on Count 1. Appellants contend that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  2. Jackson v. CO-OP CAB COMPANY, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  3. Rutland v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. West Georgia Pulpwood & Timber Co. v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  2. Harrison v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Calloway v. RossmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. Folds v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  5. King v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API