Legal Opinion

Congdon & Aylsworth v. H. W. Monroe & Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1879PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Gonzales. Tried below before the Hon. Everett Lewis. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Gould, Associate Justice.

Appellants, in their petition, alleged that H. W. Monroe and John Monroe composed the firm of H. W. Monroe & Co.; alleged a sale of goods to the firm, and, after praying for citation to defendants, prayed for judgment for their debt and for equity and general relief. The defendants filed separate answers, not verified by affidavit, denying the existence of the firm and denying the alleged indebtedness. Evidence was admitted, over the objection of appellants, establishing that there was no such firm as H. W. Monroe & Co., but that H. W. Monroe carried on business in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fowler v. DavenportTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  2. P. J. Willis & Bro. v. MorrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Cushing v. P. R. Smith & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kelsey v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  2. Keithley v. SeydellTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Sabin v. MichellOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Krightley v. SeydellTexas Supreme Court · 1883

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API