Day v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DOUGLAS, Judge.
The conviction is for murder; the punishment, thirty-three years.
The sufficiency of the evidence is challenged. It is contended that the proof does not show that the body examined by the pathologist was that of R. D. Campbell, the person alleged to have been killed. The record reflects that appellant did foundation work at an apartment house construction project. After an argument about the amount of money due the appellant, because an inspector rejected some of his work, appellant, on September 23, 1968, shot R. D. Campbell twice with a .25 caliber pistol (State’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rubenstein v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Davidson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Schneider v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Warren v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963
3Cited by10 opinions
- Valdez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Haas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Archer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Murphy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Ex Parte RobertsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.