Legal Opinion

Brown v. Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 28, 1985No. C-3-83-429PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR REASON OF LACK OF THIS COURT’S IN PERSONAM JURISDICTION; ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO TRANSFER DEEMED MOOT; CASE DISMISSED; TERMINATION ENTRY

RICE, District Judge.

The Defendant, Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority, is a political subdivision of the state of Florida, created by the state legislature for the purpose of operating a pipeline system for the distribution of potable water to the Florida Keys and distributing that water to its residential and commercial customers. On July 11, 1980, the Defendant offered for sale more than $62…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  5. In-Flight Devices Corporation v. Van Dusen Air, Incorporated, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bruley v. Lincoln Property Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1991
  2. Arison v. OfferDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. Gillespie v. SteigerMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1998
  4. Ward v. McMahonMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API