Legal Opinion
Barbour v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 8, 1985No. 83-123, 83-127PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Associate Judge:
Barbour, et al. (employees) seek review of the decision by the Department of Employment Services (DOES) which denied their applications for unemployment compensation based on a finding that they voluntarily left their jobs without good cause connected with the work under D.C.Code § 46-lll(a) (Supp.1982). The employees claim that since their unemployment was a result of a strike, their eligibility can only be determined by the “labor dispute” section, D.C.Code § 46 — 111(f) (1981). 1 Malo-ney Concrete Co., et al. (employers) seek review of that portion of the decision…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Smith v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Monroe v. ForemanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- District of Columbia v. Brookstowne Community Development Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Bates v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department v. BroadusDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.