Commonwealth v. Hallberg
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Mr. Justice Bell:
How the majority opinion reaches its conclusion in the light of the Constitution and of §81 of the Statutory Construction Act of 1937, and without overruling prior decisions of this Court is to me absolutely incomprehensible.
The majority opinion has not one but three insurmountable hurdles to jump — the Constitution, and §81 of the Statutory Construction Act, and the prior deci*561sions of this Court. A careful analysis of the majority opinion will show (1) that its interpretation makes §6 of Article III of the Constitution meaningless; (2) that it is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Willcox v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Commonwealth v. DepofiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Miller v. Belmont Packing & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Titusville Iron Works v. Keystone Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
- Commonwealth v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.