Legal Opinion
Sanderson-MacLeod, Inc. v. Hobbs Medical, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 6, 2020No. 3:19-cv-30013Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS SANDERSON-MACLEOD, INC., ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) v. ) Civil No. 19-30013-MGM ) ) HOBBS MEDICAL, INC., ) Defendant. ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES I. Introduction On November 21, 2019, the Honorable Mark G. Mastroianni granted the motion of defendant Hobbs Medical, Inc. (“Defendant”) for attorneys’ fees in this patent case (Dkt. Nos. 33, 55). The court found the case exceptional and warranting a fee award because plaintiff Sanderson-MacLeod, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) filed a facially insufficient complaint relying…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. Emiliano Valencia-CopeteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Park Motor Mart, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.