In Re Estate of Fiske
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 291 N.W. 289. By his special guardian, Scofield Fiske, an infant of 11 years, appeals from the judgment of the district court affirming an order of the probate court which refused to vacate its final decree distributing the estate and several preliminary orders which were in effect thereby confirmed. The preliminary orders questioned by appellant allow several annual and the final accounts of respondent as executor. They stand or fall with the final decree. Orders and decree are attacked on the ground of fraud, 2 Mason Minn. St. 1927, § 9405, and "mistake, inadvertence,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ladd v. WeiskopfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Wilmot v. Minneapolis Automobile Trade Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Balch v. HooperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Irish American Bank v. LudlumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Kittson v. St. Paul Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tognazzini v. TognazziniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Central National Bank v. BrewerCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1966