Legal Opinion
Donald Bruce & Co. v. B. H. Multi Com Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 15, 1997No. 96 C 8083PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GETTLEMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Donald Bruce & Company has filed a one ' count complaint for copyright infringement against defendant B. H. Multi Com Corporation. Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss or in the alternative for summary judgment. Because both parties have 1 submitted to the court evidence outside the pleadings, the court will treat the motion as one for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 56. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion is denied.
FACTS
Plaintiff is an Illinois corporation engaged in the business of designing,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Data General Corp. v. Grumman Systems Support Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Masquerade Novelty, Inc. v. Unique Industries, Inc., and Everett Novak, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Fonar Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Robert Domenick, Magnetic Resonance Plus, Inc., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Barry Kieselstein-Cord v. Accessories by Pearl, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kay Berry, Inc. v. Taylor Gifts, Inc. Bandwagon, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Eyal R.D. Corp. v. Jewelex New York, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008