Legal Opinion

Van Noy v. Frank

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 2, 1935No. Civ. 9899PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROTH, J., pro tem.

The record in this ease shows that plaintiff and appellant, Phil Van Noy, a minor, was riding in a Ford roadster, which was being operated by his brother, the owner thereof, in a southerly direction on Norton Avenue, in the city of Los Angeles. As the Ford crossed the intersection of Norton and Second Street, it was struck at the right, rear portion thereof by an Oldsmobile operated and driven in an easterly direction on Second Street by the respondent. The collision overturned the Ford, and appellant suffered various injuries as a direct consequence. An action was started…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kelley v. Hodge Transportation SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Miller v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Miller v. Baken Park, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Emery v. Northern Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  4. Britton v. GundersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Demangos v. CannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API