Beem v. Kimberly
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Winnebago County. The following statement of the case was prepared by Mr. Justice Taylob as a part of the opinion: The facts in this case are substantially as follows: Harvey L. Kimberly, the father of the appellants, Daniel L. Kimberly and Áugustios H. Kimberly, died at Neenah, in this state, November 23,1881, testate, leaving surviving him. his two sons above named and a widow, Lucy Ann Kimberly, she being a second wife and not the mother…
Read the full summary
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Winnebago County. The following statement of the case was prepared by Mr. Justice Taylob as a part of the opinion: The facts in this case are substantially as follows: Harvey L. Kimberly, the father of the appellants, Daniel L. Kimberly and Áugustios H. Kimberly, died at Neenah, in this state, November 23,1881, testate, leaving surviving him. his two sons above named and a widow, Lucy Ann Kimberly, she being a second wife and not the mother of the appellants. The will of the deceased was duly probated in the county court of Winnebago county, December 27,1881,…
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
The learned counsel for the appellants, in their briefs and in their oral arguments in this court, attack the findings in regard to the genuineness of the signature to the notice of the election filed by Lucy Ann Kimberly in the county court of Winnebago county, and also the finding that she caused it to be filed in said court. After a careful consideration of the evidence upon which these findings are based, we are not only of the opinion that the findings are supported by the evidence, but that the preponderance of the evidence is in favor of such findings. It is urged that because two…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Tevis v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858
- Havens v. . Sackett and HavensNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Baker v. O'RiordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Daniels v. FosterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
- Stump v. FindlaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1828
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pierstoff v. JorgesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- Rowell v. BarberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Parsons v. BalsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Ford v. FordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- Poulsen v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.