Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rekis v. Lake Minnewaska Mountain Houses, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 8, 1991Published

1DissentLevine, J.

I respectfully dissent. The key issue for the resolution of the entire dispute between the parties is whether plaintiff acquired a legally enforceable right to acquire fee-simple title to the five-acre subject parcel as a third-party beneficiary of the sales contract for the entire tract between defendant Lake Minnewaska Associates (hereinafter LMA) and the Nature Conservancy. Plaintiff relies upon article X of that agreement, which provided for the exclusion from the promised conveyance of the entire tract of the improved parcel plaintiff occupied and another parcel occupied by Edward…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fourth Ocean Putnam Corp. v. Interstate Wrecking Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Rothschild v. . Title Guarantee Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Mayor, Etc., of New York v. . SonnebornNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Pershall v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. City of Buffalo v. . BalcomNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API