Legal Opinion
McIntosh v. Doddy
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 3, 1947No. 6841PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By MATTHEWS, PJ.
The plaintiff obtained a verdict for $2500.00 on account of personal injuries inflicted by a dog. The trial court required a remittitur of one-third as a condition of overruling the motion for new trial. This was acceded to and judgment rendered for $1666.66. It is from that judgment that this appeal was taken.
The defendants are husband-and wife. In her petition, the plaintiff alleged that “they harbored a dog which they well knew was accustomed to attack and bite mankind, yet defendants wrongfully and negligently allowed said dog to go at large without being properly…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Flint v. HolbrookOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Beckett v. WarrenOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Vandercar v. DavidDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957
- Jones v. WashingtonOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Ward v. HumbleOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.