Legal Opinion

Larry Keatley, an individual; Virgil Rask, an individual; and Matthew Lindley, an individual v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a corporation

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided December 29, 2025No. 8:21-cv-00455Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA LARRY KEATLEY, an individual; VIRGIL RASK, an individual; and MATTHEW LINDLEY, an individual; 8:21CV455 Plaintiffs, vs. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a corporation; Defendant. This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 99). For the reasons explained below, the motion will be denied. STATEMENT OF FACTS This case arises from a train derailment that occurred on July 15, 2021. (Filing No. 41.) That day, Plaintiffs Larry Keatley (“Keatley”), Wirgil Rask (“Rask”) and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  3. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API