Larry Keatley, an individual; Virgil Rask, an individual; and Matthew Lindley, an individual v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a corporation
District Court, D. Nebraska
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA LARRY KEATLEY, an individual; VIRGIL RASK, an individual; and MATTHEW LINDLEY, an individual; 8:21CV455 Plaintiffs, vs. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a corporation; Defendant. This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 99). For the reasons explained below, the motion will be denied. STATEMENT OF FACTS This case arises from a train derailment that occurred on July 15, 2021. (Filing No. 41.) That day, Plaintiffs Larry Keatley (“Keatley”), Wirgil Rask (“Rask”) and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.