Legal Opinion

Iowa & California Land Co. v. Hoag

California Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1900No. L. A. Nos. 685, 686PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from Superior Court, Riverside County. Actions by the Iowa and California Land Company, substituted plaintiff, against Lillian D. Hoag and Abram Hoag. Judgment for plaintiff and defendants appeal. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

These actions were both actions to foreclose mortgages executed by the defendants to secure their promissory notes. The notes and the securities passed by sundry transfers and assignments to this plaintiff. The questions involved upon these appeals are identical, and the cases may therefore be considered and decided together.

The defendants executed their promissory notes, secured by mortgages upon lands in California, to the Union Loan and Trust Company, a foreign' corporation, organized under the laws of the state of Iowa. The Union Loan and Trust Company, to secure its debenture bonds,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lewis v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Ayres v. SiebelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  3. Curtis v. SmithU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1869

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gulledge Bros. Lumber Co. v. Wenatchee Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API