Legal Opinion
William H. Geisler v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 20, 1992No. 90-70631Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
955 F.2d 47
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
William H. GEISLER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 90-70631.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Jan. 9, 1992.
Decided Feb. 20, 1992.
Before POOLE, WIGGINS and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
1
MEMORANDUM*
2
William Geisler ("Taxpayer") learned in late 1979 that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. S. S. White Dental Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Nor-Cal Adjusters, AKA Nor-Cal Insurance Adjusters, Formerly Hobson Adjusters, a Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Ramsay Scarlett and Company, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Baltimore Stevedoring Company, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
- Paccar, Inc. And Subsidiaries v. Commissioner Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Edwin Christman Dawn and June Estelle Dawn v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.