Schwartz v. Bleu Evolution Bar & Restaurant Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff tripped and fell when her foot got caught in a gap between two sidewalk flags. The gap was approximately one-half-inch wide and the height differential between the flags was also approximately one-half inch. Defendants are entitled to summary judgment based on plaintiffs theory of how the accident occurred. The gap between the flags and the height differential was trivial and plaintiff has not come forward with evidence to show that the defect presented a significant hazard despite being de minimis (see Gaud v Markham, 307 AD2d 845, 846 [2003], citing Trincere v County of Suffolk,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Trincere v. County of SuffolkNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
3Cited by12 opinions
- Boynton v. Haru Sake BarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Castro v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Marks v. 79th St. Tenants Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Marks v. 79th St. Tenants Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Boynton v. Haru Sake BarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.