Legal Opinion

Brandt v. Stadler

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 7, 1913Published

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fifth District. Action by Herman Brandt against A. Lincoln Stadler. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.

The plaintiff on June 4, 1912, leased a house at the seashore from the defendant for the summer season. The lease is silent as to the payment of water rates. Thereafter the plaintiff received a bill from the Tintern Manor Water Company for $42 for water rates for the year from June 1, 1912, to June 1, 1913. The bill contained a notice that, “unless paid by August 24, 1912, the water service will be discontinued.”

In the case of New York University v. American Book Co., 132 App. Div. 732, 117 N. Y. Supp. 387, Id., 197 N. Y. 294, 90 N. E. 819, it was held that a landlord is under no obligation…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. New York University v. . American Book Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. New York University v. American Book Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API