Straff v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Price, J.,
We are here presented with the question of whether appellants’ failure to comply with a local rule of court pertaining to the filing of a Motion for a New Trial constitutes an abandonment of the motion. The lower court held that there was an abandonment and granted a motion to quash appellants’ post-trial motions. We agree and, therefore, will affirm.
Appellants initiated this cause of action claiming $93,500.00 loss by reason of a fire which destroyed their home on December 1, 1970. Appellee had denied the claim and defended this action, based upon its claim that the fire…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Budget Laundry Co. v. MUNTERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Caples v. KlugmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Nerkowski v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- New Castle Metal Products Co. v. CampbellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bolus v. United Penn BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Cherry v. WillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Schneider v. Albert Einstein Medical Center, Northern DivisionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Equipment Finance, Inc. v. TothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Hesselgesser v. Glen-Craft Contractors, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.