Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Foster v. DeWeese

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 2011No. 2011-1351PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam. Joseph Foster, pro se. James J. Mayer Jr., Richland County Prosecuting Attorney, and Jill M. Cochran, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellees.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the complaint of appellant, Joseph Foster, for writs of mandamus and procedendo to compel appellees, Richland County Court of Common Pleas and Judge James DeWeese, to issue a final, appealable order in his criminal case. Neither mandamus nor procedendo will compel the performance of a duty that has already been performed. See State ex rel. Rose v. McGinty, 123 Ohio St.3d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Williams v. McGintyOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State ex rel. Rose v. McGintyOhio Supreme Court · 2009

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stadmire v. DonnellyOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API