Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rutz v. Essex Junction Prudential Committee

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 27, 1983No. 82-087Published

1DissentHill, J.

I have considered the opinions of both the majority and dissent, and concur in the majority’s analysis of issues I, III and IV. I am reluctantly compelled to dissent from its analysis of issue II, but for reasons which differ from those set forth in the dissent of my brother Billings.

The analysis of the second issue must begin with the initial determination of whether plaintiff was afforded the due process guaranteed him through the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. In Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565, 574 (1975), the United States Supreme Court clearly established…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Epperson v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API