Legal Opinion
de la Cruz v. Kelly
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 24, 1986No. 86 Civ. 1685(RJW)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.
Petitioner Roberto de la Cruz seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. De la Cruz asserts three grounds in support of the instant petition. The Court has examined both the instant petition and the papers from de la Cruz’s direct appeal of his conviction in the New York state courts. For the reasons hereinafter stated, the Court concludes that de la Cruz presented all three claims raised in the instant petition to the state courts, and that he therefore has exhausted available state judicial remedies with regard to the petition as a whole.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Smalls v. BatistaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Mack v. ColladoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023