Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People of Michigan v. Raymond Charles Pierson

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 12, 2017No. 332500Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Boonstra, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part).

Throughout any juror's courtroom experience, a trial judge makes innumerable rulings on the admissibility of evidence. Sometimes those rulings are made in the presence of the jury; sometimes they are made outside the presence of the jury. But either way, they are rulings that are necessary to the conduct of a trial, and jurors are properly made to understand that. Both at the outset of a trial and at its conclusion, juries are therefore generally instructed regarding what constitutes evidence, the judge's role in determining…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. People v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. AkinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. People v. GilbertMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API