Legal Opinion

Forgét v. State ex rel. State Board of Public Accountancy

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 2003No. S-01-1397PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.

NATURE OF CASE

Gerard T. Forgét III was sanctioned by the Nebraska Board of Public Accountancy (the Board) for holding himself out as a certified public accountant (CPA) without holding an active CPA permit, in violation of the Public Accountancy Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 1-105 et seq. (Reissue 1997 & Cum. Supp. 2002). The primary question presented in this appeal is whether an individual who has successfully taken the CPA examination, but has not completed the experience requirement necessary to obtain a CPA permit, may be considered an “inactive” CPA and use the designation “CPA.”

BACKGROUND

Forgé…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Lusterstone Surfacing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Harris v. HarrisNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Foote v. O'Neill PackingNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Kosmicki v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. Nebraska Department of Health & Human ServicesNebraska Supreme Court · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gilroy v. RybergNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Loontjer v. RobinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Krajicek v. GaleNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Troshynski v. Nebraska State Board of Public AccountancyNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Forget v. STATE EX REL. STATE BOARDNebraska Supreme Court · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API