Forgét v. State ex rel. State Board of Public Accountancy
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.
NATURE OF CASE
Gerard T. Forgét III was sanctioned by the Nebraska Board of Public Accountancy (the Board) for holding himself out as a certified public accountant (CPA) without holding an active CPA permit, in violation of the Public Accountancy Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 1-105 et seq. (Reissue 1997 & Cum. Supp. 2002). The primary question presented in this appeal is whether an individual who has successfully taken the CPA examination, but has not completed the experience requirement necessary to obtain a CPA permit, may be considered an “inactive” CPA and use the designation “CPA.”
BACKGROUND
Forgé…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nelson v. Lusterstone Surfacing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- Harris v. HarrisNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Foote v. O'Neill PackingNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Kosmicki v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. Nebraska Department of Health & Human ServicesNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gilroy v. RybergNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Loontjer v. RobinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Krajicek v. GaleNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Troshynski v. Nebraska State Board of Public AccountancyNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- Forget v. STATE EX REL. STATE BOARDNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.