Legal Opinion

Jackson v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 30, 1956No. 1825PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ROVER, Chief Judge.

Appellant was prosecuted for keeping for sale and selling alcoholic beverages without the license required by our Code 1951, § 25-109. The jury returned a verdict of guilty on both counts.

As ground for reversal the appellant urges a single assignment of error. It relates to the refusal of the trial court to declare a mistrial, when, during the prosecution’s case, a police officer’s testimony disclosed appellant’s admission of a prior arrest for a like crime. This, the appellant contends, was prejudicial and reversible error as tending to establish his guilt of an offense…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Moore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Tillison v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  3. Hilliard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  4. State v. SaltzmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  5. Burge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1906

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API