Legal Opinion

Thomas v. LaCotts

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 18, 1953No. 5-31PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Griffin Smith, Chief Justice.

The pleadings aré voluminous. Appellant’s abstract, brief, and his reply brief cover more than 650 pages.

Mill Bayou, or Mill Creek Bayou — as the sluggish waters are referred to by interchangeable terms — separates the LaCotts property from more than 2,500 acres owned by Thomas. A large part of Thomas’ land is adapted to farming and some is suited to rice growing, but duck-shooting privileges form a substantial part of his income.

Appellant asserts- ownership of the east half of section three, township five south, range four west, in Arkansas county, and he has…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Meriwether Sand & Gravel Co. v. State Ex Rel. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  2. Taylor v. RudySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  3. Boone v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Welter v. CurrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  2. Harris v. BrooksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  3. Harrell v. City of ConwaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  4. Thomas v. FoglioOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. DeVore Farms, Inc. v. Butler Hunting Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API