Legal Opinion

Millard v. Truax

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from. Ingham. (Gridley, J.) Bill to redeem a mortgage. Complainant appeals. The-facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Complainant, as grantee of a title once

belonging to Clark Cummings, filed his bill to redeem a mortgage made by Cummings to defendant on December 20, 1876, for $2,550, with semi-annual interest at 10 per cent. The circuit court for the county of Ingham, where the bill was filed, found there was due a principal sum of $2,000, and interest to the further amount of $1,733.22, or in all, $3,733.22, at the date of the commissioner's report. It was further found that defendant was liable for rents and profits, before and after the report, to the amount of $1,369. Defendant was allowed $187.5Í for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Graydon v. ChurchMichigan Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jellison v. HalloranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. State Bank of Tabor v. KellySupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  3. Campbell v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Eppley v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932
  5. Eppley v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API