Fritz v. Ramspott
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Blue Earth county for partition. The case was tried before Severance, J., who found substantially in favor of defendant. From an order denying a motion' for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
START, c. J.
This is an action for partition of a lot in the city of Mankato.
The facts, as found by the trial court and as appear from the undisputed evidence, are these: The plaintiff and defendant each own in fee an undivided one-half of the lot, which is so situated that actual partition thereof cannot be made without great prejudice to the owners. On June 12, 1889, the then owner, Frederick Kron, conveyed the lot by warranty deed to August Ramspott, and on the same day the latter, who was then unmarried, executed a mortgage on the lot to the former to secure the payment of $500.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Newton v. NewtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Lewis & Pickering v. C. W. Williams & SonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1859
- Roussain v. PattenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Plymouth Cordage Co. v. SeymourSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Mead v. RandallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ludowese v. AmidonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Shraiberg v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Seifert v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Engenmoen v. LutroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Goette v. HoweSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.