Legal Opinion

Southland Milling Co. v. Vege Fat, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided December 8, 1965No. Civ. 65-39PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUERGENS, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff Southland Milling Co. brings this action to recover damages from defendant, allegedly caused by defendant’s supplying contaminated and toxic liquid vegetable fat which was fed to poultry and resulted in cessation of egg production and ultimately caused the poultry to become sickly and die.

Jurisdiction is founded on diversity of citizenship. Plaintiff is a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Georgia with its principal place of business in that state. The defendant is an Illinois corporation and has its principal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Rotche v. Buick Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Patargias v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Chicago, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1947
  5. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. HammondCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kasel v. Remington Arms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Blommer Chocolate Co. v. Bongards Creameries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
  3. Kasel v. Remington Arms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API