Legal Opinion

Rochelle v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 26, 1976No. 74-1639PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The trustee points out that it has not received a refund of penalties and that no judgment has been entered for such a refund although, as we pointed out in our opinion, si. op. p. 298, the United States concedes that penalties were not allowable in bankruptcy and states that it so conceded to the trial court. The trustee requests that we enter judgment for the full amount of the penalties. The United States, while reiterating that a refund of penalties is in order, asserts that judgment should be for less than the full amount. Since establishment of the correct amount to be refunded involves…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Marshall v. Gibson's Products, Inc. of PlanoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. In Re BrittonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1988
  4. In Re Sound Emporium, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1984
  5. Texas Bank & Trust v. United States (In Re Sound Emporium, Inc.)District Court, W.D. Texas · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API