Legal Opinion
Martin v. Martin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 7, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the plaintiffs amended cross motion which was for an award of arrears. Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the plaintiffs testimony, which was credited by a Judicial Hearing Officer, coupled with her submission of receipts, were sufficient to establish the amounts of the payments she made for the cost of child care necessitated by her employment (see Matter of Klindworth v Garron, 40 AD3d 642, 643 [2007]; see also Matter of Broffman-Kaminsky v Santo, 74 AD3d 1336, 1337 [2010]; Matter of Spiegel v Spiegel, 68 AD3d 881, 882 [2009]).
The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nebons v. NebonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Parnes v. ParnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Spiegel v. SpiegelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Szekely v. SzekelyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Levine v. LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Matter of Barmoha v. EisayevAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Garcia v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Garcia v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013