Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Jordan v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1980No. 14274Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHarris, Associate Judge

I agree with my colleagues that a remand is appropriate. However, I would not set aside the convictions, but rather would remand the record for a hearing as to whether appellant knowingly and intelligently entered into the stipulation which formed the basis for the findings of his guilt. I write this statement in part because the majority opinion does not state precisely what reversible error occurred, and in part because of my related belief that it unwarrantedly implies a degree of dereliction on the part of the trial court.

There had been separate hearings on appellant’s codefendants’…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Foster v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Battle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  3. In re J. N. H.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Michaels Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API