Legal Opinion

Roe v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided March 8, 2005No. 3030032PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCLANAHAN, Judge.

George Julious Roe appeals from a decision of the trial court allowing the Commonwealth to re-indict him on the same offenses for which indictments had previously been dismissed. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court.

I. Background

Roe was indicted by a grand jury for abduction, using a firearm in the commission of abduction, possession of a firearm by a felon, and discharging a firearm in an occupied dwelling. When the case was called for trial, Roe did not appear because he was in federal custody. The Commonwealth moved for a continuance. A judge of the trial…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ohree v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
  2. Stockton v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  3. Rusty's Welding Service, Inc. v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1999
  4. McGinnis v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1985
  5. Johnston v. HunterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1901

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roe v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  2. Joseph C. Florio v. Barbara E. Clark, William B. Clark and Joyce ChildersCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
  3. Roe v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API