Roe v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
McCLANAHAN, Judge.
George Julious Roe appeals from a decision of the trial court allowing the Commonwealth to re-indict him on the same offenses for which indictments had previously been dismissed. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court.
I. Background
Roe was indicted by a grand jury for abduction, using a firearm in the commission of abduction, possession of a firearm by a felon, and discharging a firearm in an occupied dwelling. When the case was called for trial, Roe did not appear because he was in federal custody. The Commonwealth moved for a continuance. A judge of the trial…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ohree v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
- Stockton v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Rusty's Welding Service, Inc. v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1999
- McGinnis v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1985
- Johnston v. HunterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1901
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Roe v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2006
- Joseph C. Florio v. Barbara E. Clark, William B. Clark and Joyce ChildersCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
- Roe v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005