Legal Opinion
Estate of Bullock v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
Decided September 30, 1960No. Docket No. 63103UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Estate of Ethel M. Bullock, Deceased, Hubert A. Foster, Executor v. Commissioner.
Estate of Bullock v. Commissioner
Docket No. 63103.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1960-204; 1960 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 81; 19 T.C.M. (CCH) 1080; T.C.M. (RIA) 60204;
September 30, 1960
Sidney R. Reed, 608 South Hill Street, Los Angeles, Calif., for the petitioner.
Alfred L. Margolis, Esq., and R. E. Maiden, Jr, Esq., for the respondent.
FORRESTER
Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion
FORRESTER, Judge: Respondent has determined a deficiency of $22,827.32 in the estate tax liability of the petitioner. The issues remaining…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Doyle v. Mitchell Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Estate of Daniel McNichol Deceased, Ellen McNichol Evangelista and Joseph G. McNichol Executors v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Gallagher v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- McNichol v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
- First-Mechanics Nat. Bank v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. WhiteDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1987