Carey & Hill v. Cranston & Stovall
Supreme Court of Georgia
Complaint on account. Before Judge Reese. Hancock superior court. February term, 1895. Cranston & Stovall, as a firm composed of W. J. Cranston and-Stovall, sued Carey & Hill in complaint upon an account. Defendant pleaded tbe general issue. Upon tbe trial plaintiffs put in evidence testimony of F. M. Stovall, as follows: I am a member of the firm of Cranston & Stovall. Mrs. Anna H. Cranston, of Augusta, Ga., is my copartner.
Read the full summary
Complaint on account. Before Judge Reese. Hancock superior court. February term, 1895. Cranston & Stovall, as a firm composed of W. J. Cranston and-Stovall, sued Carey & Hill in complaint upon an account. Defendant pleaded tbe general issue. Upon tbe trial plaintiffs put in evidence testimony of F. M. Stovall, as follows: I am a member of the firm of Cranston & Stovall. Mrs. Anna H. Cranston, of Augusta, Ga., is my copartner. Tbe witness explained tbe beginning and conduct of their business with defendants, and testified to the correctness of the account sued on and that the amount sued for…
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
Where a partnership brings an action in its firm name, stating in its declaration the names of the persons constituting the firm, a misnomer in the Christian name of either of the persons named as copartners may he corrected instanter, on motion, by amendment. Code, §3483; Johnson v. Central Railroad, 74 Ga. 397. Judgment affirmed,.
Hunt <& Merritt, for plaintiffs in error. R. H. Lewis, contra.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Orr Stationery Co. v. Bell & Lee Drug Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908