Legal Opinion

Ajdler v. Mendoza

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 23, 2019No. 17-2704-cvUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

17-2704-cv Ajdler v. Mendoza UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. At…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. NML Capital v. Republic of ArgentinaNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Ajdler v. Province of MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API