Legal Opinion

Emmertz v. Cherry

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 13, 1999No. S99A1039PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Hunstein, Justice.

Prior to his death in September 1997, Lawrence Emmertz purchased three life insurance policies and named as the sole beneficiary his daughter, Sandra Emmertz Cherry. Cherry was also a beneficiary, along with her two brothers, of the residual estate under her father’s will. Because the testator had retained incidents of ownership in the life insurance policies, this nonprobate property was included in the value of his gross estate for Federal estate tax purposes. See § 2042 (2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (“IRC”), 26 USC § 2001 et seq. Lawrence Emmertz, Jr., the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Firstar Trust Co. v. First National Bank of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  2. In the Matter of Estate of TovreaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  3. Legare v. LegareSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cross v. StokesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API