Legal Opinion
Whitney Stores, Inc. v. Summerford
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided February 12, 1968No. Civ. A. 67-771PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEMPHILL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, 1 insisting that Sections 64-2 through 64-2.5 2 of the South Carolina Code of Laws, as amended, are unconstitutional, ask a declaratory judgment of such in this court. They further seek judgment that a pattern of discriminatory enforcement exists, and position that the unconstitutional application and enforcement invite and deserve injunctive relief. As to plaintiffs’ contentions of the unconstitútionality of the statutes, in themselves, this court does not agree. The district court will examine the facts bearing on discriminatory enforcement.
Complaint…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Braunfeld v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Carter v. StantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Zentgraf v. TEXAS a & M UNIVERSITYDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1980
- Home Depot, Inc., and Gaylord's National Corporation v. William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Louisiana, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. LewisDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1973
- State in Interest of LMNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.