Hamilton Gin & Mill Co. v. Sinker, Davis & Co.
Texas Supreme Court
Error from Dallas. Tried below before Hon. Geo. N. Aldredge. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Gaines, Associate Justice.
This suit was instituted March 22,1886, by defendant in error, as a corporation, to recover of plaintiff in error, also as a corporation, an indebtedness evidenced by four promissory notes, and to forclose a mortgage upon real estate given to secure the indebtedness. 'There was a judgment by default.
The plaintiff in error assigns as error, first, that the citation is insufficient to support the judgment; but the citation is not copied into the record and the assignment can not therefore be considered. The judgment recites that the defendant was duly cited. If the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dutchess Cotton Manufactory v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1817
- President of the Goshen & Minisink Turnpike Road v. HurtinNew York Supreme Court · 1812
- Miner v. Paris Exchange BankTexas Supreme Court · 1880
- R. A. Brown & Co. v. ChancellorTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Watkins v. P. J. Willis & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1883
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cudahy Packing Co. v. State Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Lamb v. HardyTexas Supreme Court · 1919
- In re T. H. Thompson Milling Co.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1906
- Carey Lombard Lumber Co. v. First National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1893