Legal Opinion

Millner v. Elias

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 28, 1924PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKeeler, J.

As divided in the brief of the appellant, the errors assigned are considered under three groups. In the first group, error is assigned in the admission by the court of testimony as to the location of the division line between the respective properties of the parties, and in its charge as to the effect of such evidence. In the second group, in the failure of the court to charge the jury that the fence in question was a division fence. In the third group, in charging the jury that the defendant was not bound by the division of fence entered into by defendant’s predecessor in title.

Regarding the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Plumb v. CurtisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  2. Guyer v. StrattonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
  3. Wright v. WrightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1851
  4. Edgerton v. MooreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1859

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lombardo v. SimkoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API