Legal Opinion

Howard v. Faberge, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided September 13, 1984No. 01-83-0649-CVPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DOYLE, Justice.

This is an appeal from a take nothing judgment against the appellant in a strict liability action.

In 1976, the appellant suffered upper body burns allegedly due to the flammability of Brut 33 Splash-On Lotion, which he had poured over his hands and chest. According to the appellant, the Brut lotion ignited when the appellant accidently dropped a match into his waistband. The appellant brought a strict liability suit against the appellee, alleging that the product lacked a warning indicating the product’s flammability. The jury found against the appellant, and judgment…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Otis Elevator Company v. WoodTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Southern Pine Lumber Co. v. AndradeTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. NowakCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  4. Texas Sand Company v. ShieldTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  5. King v. SkellyTexas Supreme Court · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. McCraw v. MarisTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Raw Hide Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Maxus Exploration Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1988
  3. Moore v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  4. Fibreboard Corp. v. PoolCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Ponder v. Texarkana Memorial Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API