Legal Opinion
City of New York v. 1820-1838 Amsterdam Equities, Inc. (In re 1820-1838 Amsterdam Equities, Inc.)
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 13, 1994No. M-47 (RWS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
In Re Amsterdam
Creditor-Appellant the City of New York (the “City”) seeks leave to appeal an order of *128the Honorable Prudence B. Abram, Bankruptcy Judge, of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York denying its motion to dismiss the Debtor’s Chapter 11 petition.
For reasons set foi'th below, leave to appeal is denied at this time.
The Parties
The Debtor, 1820-1838 Amsterdam Equities (“Amsterdam”), is the owner of a commercial building located at that address in Upper Manhattan. The debtor filed for voluntary bankruptcy under Chapter 11…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- In Re Denis Brody, Debtor. Carol Brody v. Denis BrodyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- In Re Beker Industries Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Farley v. Coffee Cupboard, Inc. (In Re Coffee Cupboard, Inc.)District Court, E.D. New York · 1990
- Robinson v. Silverman (In re Johns-Manville Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Back v. LTV Corp. (In Re Chateaugay Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Aquatic Development Group, Inc. v. Thomas (In Re Aquatic Development Group, Inc.)District Court, N.D. New York · 1996