Legal Opinion

Costigan v. Schalk

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1924No. 11,991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBatman, J.

Appellants filed a complaint against appellees, in which it is alleged in substance, among other things, that on January 7, 1922, a judgment and decree of foreclosure was rendered against appellants, other than Lillian Costigan, in favor of appellee Schalk; that said judgment and 'decree was duly set aside on April 18, 1922, and thereafter appellants, John S. and William S. Costigan, by leave of court, filed their joint answer to the complaint in said foreclosure proceeding; that no reply was filed to said answer, but that the issue tendered thereby remained open until June 10, 1922, when the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. Berkshire Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Young v. WileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Cincinnati, Indianapolis & Western Railroad v. LittleIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Tecumseh Coal & Mining Co. v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Central Bank v. MartinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HladiicIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Cates v. LongIndiana Court of Appeals · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API